Re: future of blas/lapack/atlas packages?
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Matthias Klose <email@example.com> wrote:
> Ondrej Certik writes:
>> thanks Matthias for raising this issue. I am interested in helping with
>> We need to maintain the packages in a svn/git repository and I suggest
>> we simply create new packges, something like
>> or something. We get it compile, we get it to debian and we start fixing
>> all potential problems. Let's have both atlas 3.6 and atlas 3.8 and
>> users will simply use those, that work. When we get 3.8 in a good shape,
>> we may then for example remove the libatlas-* packages and provide them
>> with libatlas3.8-* etc.
> please don't rename the package without reason. uploads to
> experimental should do fine here.
Yes, I forgot about experimental. Yes, that would work perfectly fine.