Re: BLAS and LAPACK in Ubuntu
Sam Halliday schrieb:
> On 26 Nov 2007, at 14:40, Camm Maguire wrote:
>> This is currently in progress. I had decided to get the gfortran
>> transition in first, but there appear to be portability issues which
>> might take a reasonable time to fix. I suppose a separate lapack3.1
>> is in order while this is worked out.
>
>
> Thanks :-)
>
> btw... gfortran currently points to gfortran-4.2 whereas all the other
> gcc virtual packages point to version 4.1. I've had some problems
> linking to libgfortran in version 4.2 and have reverted to 4.1
> (specifically when building ARPACK). Don't know if you're aware of this,
> but I'd suggest pointing gfortran to gfortran-4.1 for now.
no, reverting back to 4.1 is not a solution. please test with gfortran-4.3
(experimental) if the problem persists.
Matthias
Reply to: