[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package



On So, 25 MÀr 2012, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > YOu reported against tex-common. And even against jadetex I cannot
> > reproduce this behaviour, not even in a minimal chroot
> > with only those packages I mentioned installed ...
> 
> Yes. The bug happens with tex-common. If it is jadetex, feel free to
> reassign the bug to that package. It is easy to do so.

Already done in the first email, and retitled, and closed in the
new upload of jadetex, all done last night.

> > ulem.sty, because it *is* in texlive-generic-recommended.
> 
> Well, I did search for this file and it was not in the package. But at
> the moment I start a new try. The files are downloading.

Well, that could be a consequence of the missing dependency, that
jadetex is tried to be configured *before* texlive-generic-recommended
is updated. But that would be strange, since tex-common breaks against
all these, so it should be already unpacked.

> > Can you reproduce this behaviour?
> 
> I was able, yes. At the moment I download the packages. Will take around
> 15 Minutes.

Let me know if you can reproduce it with the latest jadetex, thanks.
And send me in the broken state the information I asked.

Best wishes

Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining            preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan                                 TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BILBSTER
A pimple so hideous and enormous that you have to cover it with
sticking plaster and pretend you've cut yourself shaving.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff



Reply to: