Bug#665458: Another grave bug of tex-common leeding to uninstallable package
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
Am So den 25. Mär 2012 um 9:54 schrieb Norbert Preining:
> Discussion about severity finished. fullstop.
As I told, play your childish severity game alone.
> > uninstallable means unusable in my eyes. important is the wrong
>
> YOu reported against tex-common. And even against jadetex I cannot
> reproduce this behaviour, not even in a minimal chroot
> with only those packages I mentioned installed ...
Yes. The bug happens with tex-common. If it is jadetex, feel free to
reassign the bug to that package. It is easy to do so.
> > > > ! LaTeX Error: File `ulem.sty' not found.
> >
> > Package texlive-generic-recommended was installed.
>
> That is interesting ... if it was installed, then before running
> the triggers of tex-common, mktexlsr is run. So it should find
> ulem.sty, because it *is* in texlive-generic-recommended.
Well, I did search for this file and it was not in the package. But at
the moment I start a new try. The files are downloading.
> Can you reproduce this behaviour?
I was able, yes. At the moment I download the packages. Will take around
15 Minutes.
GruÃ?
Klaus
--
Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/
pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen <Klaus@Ethgen.de>
Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=s+qL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: