[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Upgrade test from sarge to etch



Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:

>> This one is still there, but I suppose it's wanted. Right?
>
> I don't think so.  We had: 

OK. I had in mind paragraph 4.1 of an older version of the TeX Policy,
that says this:

,----
| To prevent inflation of configuration files, packages should not install
| any TeX input files as conffiles or configuration files. Instead, they
| should create an empty directory below /etc/texmf/tex and advice users
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^                  ^^^
                                                    ???
                    (anyway, it's not in the latest version of the Policy)
 
| which files are likely places for configuration. It is up to the local
| admin or individual user to place changed copies in TEXMFSYSCONFIG or
| TEXMFCONFIG, respectively.
`----

But if you say it should be removed, I trust you.

> The command in the for loop should have been 
>
>   test -d /etc/texmf/$dir && rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/texmf/$dir || true
>
> as we also do in postrm.  I've fixed that, but only in the repository,
> after the upload.  

Thanks.

-- 
Florent



Reply to: