Re: ConTeXt installtion and Debian
Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch> wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <ralf.stubner@physik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
>
>> Frank Küster wrote:
>>> Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So what be the path we want to choose? I have submitted to svn
>>>> something which uses
>>>> TEXFONTMAPS = .;$TEXMF/{fonts/map,}/{$progname,pdftex,dvips,}//
>>>> but I would be happy with
>>>> TEXFONTMAPS = .;$TEXMF/fonts/map/{$progname,pdftex,dvips,}//
>>>> too
>>>>
>>>> Any comments what we actually choose?
>>>
>>> The latter, I'd say.
>>
>> So you are confident that there is no package in Debian still using the
>> old paths for map files?
>
> No, I'm sorry - I didn't read carefully and thought that Norbert was
> comparing his original commit to your no-triple-slash-optimized
> version.
I have now committed your suggestion,
% font name map files.
% TEXFONTMAPS = .;$TEXMF/{fonts/map,}/{$progname,pdftex,dvips,}//
% To avoid triple slashes, Debian uses:
TEXFONTMAPS = .;$TEXMF{/fonts/map,}{/$progname,/pdftex,/dvips,}//
...
>>>> And after this, I am FOR an upload after a final check of the
>>>> dh_installtex changes and the man page.
>>>
>>> And after adding proper versioned depends on debconf (and maybe grep?)
>>
>> How to find out which version is needed? Or should we just use the one
>> that currently is in etch?
>
> For debconf, it's
>
> debconf (1.4.69) unstable; urgency=low
... and am testing the package. I've also filed a bug against
debhelper (no number yet).
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: