Re: Future versions of teTeX, and TeXlive as a replacement
On Fre, 02 Jun 2006, Bruce Sass wrote:
> If this gets packaged it should be in the base, same reason as
> with algorithm.sty.
Just one comment: I can bring many of these topics to upstream
attention, but I will *not* change the packaging my moving many classes
around without specific and good argumentation.
For fpl/pazo Ralf provided a good argument:PSNFSS asks for it, and since
psnfss is required, we put the stuff into the -recommended packages.
For arbitrary classes which might be of interest this will not be done.
> > I guess it will be best if most of these things work with "base" TeX
> > packages, while LyX can suggest further TeX packages for other things.
>
> ya
So one has to test it, but this will not be me.
> Is Debian the first to tackle a tetex-texlive co-existence or transition?
Yes, I tried to make the packages as good partners as possible.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEMPHIS (n.)
The little bits of yellow fluff which get trapped in the hinge of the
windscreen wipers after polishing the car with a new duster.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: