Re: tpm2licenses
Hi Frank!
On Mit, 26 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> > (but the CoverageCHeck is still executed, which is a bad idea)
>
> I had to add a "nocoverage" option, anyway - otherwise it doesn't give
> readable output in teTeX currently. So that's gone away.
Good.
> > Please review the script and test, I might have introduced some bugs
> > with the last changes I did.
>
> It works like a charm. I detected some errors introduced earlier by me
> and corrected them.
Good, so we can continue hacking.
> >> which "foreach (@debian_package)" do you mean? I can't find it.
>
> I must be blind. Nearly everything was in list_licenses, but nowhere
No, I am blind, I saw
for ($debian_package) { ...
in printFiles. BTW, what does the "for" do, my perl book is far away.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEELEY (adj.)
Descriptive of a drunk person's attempt to be endearing.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
Reply to: