[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#178712: tetex-bin: mktexpk handles ttf fonts with gsftopk, which breaks on CJK



On 2005-08-02T10:24:29+0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Unfortunately, I am not familiar with using TTF fonts in TeX at all, let
> alone CJK fonts.  Can you tell us whether the problem still exists, and
> if yes give us a small example file (and tell us which packages need to
> be installed so that we can test it)?

Hello,

I'm running teTeX from unstable:

    tetex-base                  2.0.2c-8
    tetex-bin                   2.0.2-31
    tetex-extra                 2.0.2c-8
    cjk-latex                   4.5.1-4
    tfm-arphic-bkai00mp         2.11.2-0.1
    tfm-arphic-bsmi00lp         2.11.2-0.1
    tfm-arphic-gbsn00lp         2.11.2-0.1
    tfm-arphic-gkai00mp         2.11.2-0.1
    ttf-arphic-bkai00mp         2.10-6
    ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp         2.10-6
    ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp         2.11-6
    ttf-arphic-gkai00mp         2.11-6

The problem seems to have persisted.  A sample DVI file is at
http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~ccshan/debbugs/tetex-bin/178712.dvi .
If I put the line

    Map arphic.map

in a file in /etc/texmf/updmap.d, and clear /var/cache/fonts, then

    update-updmap; updmap; xdvi 178712.dvi

does not properly produce the PK fonts necessary to display the Chinese
sentences in the first paragraph on the second page correctly.  By
contrast, if I don't put anything in /etc/texmf/updmap.d, but instead
add the line

    map +arphic.map

to /etc/texmf/pdftex/pdftex.cfg, and clear /var/cache/fonts, then

    update-updmap; updmap; xdvi 178712.dvi

does display the Chinese sentences correctly.

	Ken

-- 
Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig
2005-08-12 International Youth Day    http://www.un.org/youth/
2005-09-08 International Literacy Day http://www.un.org/depts/dhl/literacy/
2005-09-21 International Day of Peace http://www.internationaldayofpeace.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: