Re: pfb2t1c2pfb status?

[Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>]

From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Subject: Re: pfb2t1c2pfb status?
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:50:53 +0100

> > as far as I checked.  It seems the situation of *cm-super* 
> > packages in unstable is a bit confusing so I hope pfb2t1c2pfb
> > will be uploaded soon and get clean *cm-super* packages.
> 
> Well, I already included the Suggest on the package. There is also
> already support for it in the cm-super package, if the bin t1c2pfb
> exists, it is used instead of the slow perl script.
> 
> As soon as pfb2t1c is actually in debian, I will fully depend on it.

Yse, I know it and cm-super itself is clean already.

Sorry for my poor english but what I wanted to say was; 
there are yet pts-tetex-cm-super and cm-super(-x11) together 
in unstable and a description of pts-tetex-cm-super said "Note 
that this package will be rename cm-super on next upload" but
a version of it is 0.3.3-7 and a version of cm-super is 0.3.3-2 
so, at first, I was confused much ;-)

After I read thread for pfb2t1c2pfb (it is very interesting
story), I understand the situation.

Regards,			2005-11-10(Thu)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima