[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#328291: marked as done (tex-common: could manage the permissions of the ls-R files like tetex did)



Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:02:08 -0700
with message-id <E1ENAmW-0008Gh-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#328291: fixed in tex-common 0.8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 16:51:04 +0000
>From preining@logic.at Wed Sep 14 09:51:04 2005
Return-path: <preining@logic.at>
Received: from alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.175.20] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFaTQ-0005nX-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:51:04 -0700
Received: from host45-221.pool80183.interbusiness.it
	([80.183.221.45] helo=gandalf.localdomain ident=Debian-exim)
	by alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1EFaTO-0008Pe-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:51:02 +0200
Received: from norbert by gandalf.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EFaTJ-0006UX-DT
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:50:57 +0200
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:50:57 +0200
From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tex-common: could manage the permissions of the ls-R files like tetex did
Message-ID: <20050914165057.GA24944@gandalf>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tex-common
Version: 0.7
Severity: wishlist

A reminder: tetex did some magic with the ls-R files and debconf
questions, setting properties respectively.

Should tex-common do this, too?

What should be the permissions of /var/cache/fonts/ls-R in the
non-debconf case?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc6-mm2
Locale: LANG=de_AT@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_AT@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.4.58     Debian configuration management sy
ii  ucf                           2.001      Update Configuration File: preserv

tex-common recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328291-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 15:11:44 +0000
>From katie@spohr.debian.org Wed Oct 05 08:11:44 2005
Return-path: <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1ENAmW-0008Gh-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:02:08 -0700
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
To: 328291-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328291: fixed in tex-common 0.8
Message-Id: <E1ENAmW-0008Gh-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:02:08 -0700
Delivered-To: 328291-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: tex-common
Source-Version: 0.8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tex-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tex-common_0.8.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tex-common/tex-common_0.8.dsc
tex-common_0.8.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/tex-common/tex-common_0.8.tar.gz
tex-common_0.8_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tex-common/tex-common_0.8_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 328291@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> (supplier of updated tex-common package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  5 Oct 2005 16:14:46 +0200
Source: tex-common
Binary: tex-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description: 
 tex-common - Common infrastructure for using and building TeX in Debian
Closes: 328291 332115
Changes: 
 tex-common (0.8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Change hyph_size to 8191 - according to DEK it should be a prime
     number.  [frank]
   * Add a (closes:...) to the last version's changelog entry to make
     tracking history easier, in fact the bug has been closed manually
     [frank].
   * fix update-texmf to not go into an endless loop when called with an
     unknown option [frank]
   * Modify postrm.in script to remove TEXMFSYSVAR and /var/cache/fonts
     (thus also removing left over files at purge time) [preining]
   * manage ls-R files using debconf [preining].  The translations have
     been copied over from tetex-bin [frank]. (Closes: #328291)
   * Let the debconf dependency be created by debhelper, thus allowing
     debconf-2.0 as an alternative [frank] (closes: #332115)
   * In fact install the pdf version of the Policy draft, but include it in
     the tar.gz file.  Thus we can drop the Build-dependency on
     tetex-extra.  A working TeX system is only needed on the developer's
     system if the policy source has been changed.
Files: 
 d2bdd1587a34da9c029af8f026a96fed 732 tex optional tex-common_0.8.dsc
 11f1ffa8280790e5f5a4e1f4531a16ef 205457 tex optional tex-common_0.8.tar.gz
 4da17e742a817ab9e8915273299cde54 183796 tex optional tex-common_0.8_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDQ+nf+xs9YyJS+hoRAsxdAJ4uacc3Ybl7EPYcXXX3m7e5nbUpuwCgle4Y
VTeKDw/VrN+Z8X3pwQaticE=
=GYwz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: