[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#332115: marked as done (tex-common depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)



Your message dated Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:02:09 -0700
with message-id <E1ENAmX-0008Gj-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#332115: fixed in tex-common 0.8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 23:46:57 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Tue Oct 04 16:46:57 2005
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EMwUr-0005fu-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:46:57 -0700
Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id B5A7317F72; Tue,  4 Oct 2005 23:46:57 +0000 (GMT)
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tex-common depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20051004234657.B5A7317F72@kitenet.net>
Date: Tue,  4 Oct 2005 23:46:57 +0000 (GMT)
From: joey@kitenet.net (Joey Hess)
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tex-common

This package depends/pre-depends on debconf without allowing the dependency
to be satisfied with an alternate of debconf-2.0. That is to say, its
dependency should read: debconf | debconf-2.0

Until this is fixed, it is impossible to use this package with cdebconf,
and very hard to impossible to install cdebconf at all.

debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has been
provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf began
automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies it
generates for packages using debhelper. So if you're using a current
version of debhelper you should only need to rebuild your package and
review it. If you are not using debhelper, make sure the dependency is
modified to allow debconf-2.0 to satisfy it.

This bug report was filed by semiautomated means after a trio of posts to
the debian-devel mailing list, and you have probably also received a bcced
mail about the issue before. If your package's dependencies are correct and
it really has some valid reason to depend on debconf alone, please reassign
this bug report to cdebconf with an explanation of what debconf feature
your package depends on, so it can be reimplemented in cdebconf.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 332115-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 15:09:04 +0000
>From katie@spohr.debian.org Wed Oct 05 08:09:04 2005
Return-path: <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1ENAmX-0008Gj-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:02:09 -0700
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
To: 332115-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#332115: fixed in tex-common 0.8
Message-Id: <E1ENAmX-0008Gj-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:02:09 -0700
Delivered-To: 332115-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: tex-common
Source-Version: 0.8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tex-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tex-common_0.8.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tex-common/tex-common_0.8.dsc
tex-common_0.8.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/tex-common/tex-common_0.8.tar.gz
tex-common_0.8_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tex-common/tex-common_0.8_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 332115@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> (supplier of updated tex-common package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  5 Oct 2005 16:14:46 +0200
Source: tex-common
Binary: tex-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description: 
 tex-common - Common infrastructure for using and building TeX in Debian
Closes: 328291 332115
Changes: 
 tex-common (0.8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Change hyph_size to 8191 - according to DEK it should be a prime
     number.  [frank]
   * Add a (closes:...) to the last version's changelog entry to make
     tracking history easier, in fact the bug has been closed manually
     [frank].
   * fix update-texmf to not go into an endless loop when called with an
     unknown option [frank]
   * Modify postrm.in script to remove TEXMFSYSVAR and /var/cache/fonts
     (thus also removing left over files at purge time) [preining]
   * manage ls-R files using debconf [preining].  The translations have
     been copied over from tetex-bin [frank]. (Closes: #328291)
   * Let the debconf dependency be created by debhelper, thus allowing
     debconf-2.0 as an alternative [frank] (closes: #332115)
   * In fact install the pdf version of the Policy draft, but include it in
     the tar.gz file.  Thus we can drop the Build-dependency on
     tetex-extra.  A working TeX system is only needed on the developer's
     system if the policy source has been changed.
Files: 
 d2bdd1587a34da9c029af8f026a96fed 732 tex optional tex-common_0.8.dsc
 11f1ffa8280790e5f5a4e1f4531a16ef 205457 tex optional tex-common_0.8.tar.gz
 4da17e742a817ab9e8915273299cde54 183796 tex optional tex-common_0.8_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDQ+nf+xs9YyJS+hoRAsxdAJ4uacc3Ybl7EPYcXXX3m7e5nbUpuwCgle4Y
VTeKDw/VrN+Z8X3pwQaticE=
=GYwz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: