Re: new cm-super package available (with md5sum and pfb under dpkg hack)
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Since generating updmap.cfg will be mandatory in etch, I wouldn't bother
>> with that. Just use update-updmap; if a sarge user has chosen otherwise
>> and complains that their hand-crafted updmap.cfg is overwritten, you can
>> tell them they're on their own when using software that hasn't been
>> released with sarge.
>
> So the following in postinst and postrm would be ok
> /usr/bin/update-updmap
> # if the -sys variant exists (texlive, tetex3) call it,
> # otherwise call the original updmap
> if [ -x /usr/sbin/updmap-sys ] ; then
> /usr/sbin/updmap-sys
> else
> /usr/bin/env updmap
> fi
,---- Policy 6.1
| Programs called from maintainer scripts should not normally have a
| path prepended to them.
`----
so I'd just use updmap-sys or updmap, respectively, and no env hacks.
> BTW: How should we continue with cm-super package? You could sponsor it
> and upload, since the old one has a different name. But OTOH I consider
> this a bit inpolite. Again OTOH, I haven't heard anything from Mickael
> Profeta since some time, not one response.
He has stated several times (both on the list and in the changelog of
the last upload) that he plans an other upload. Maybe he's just on
vacation?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: