Re: CVS experimental problems
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 11:12:07AM +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I've just noticed that only one file in tetex-bin/texmf.d checked out
> > in the experimental branch. I think there are a lot of files there
> > missing the latest experimental tag - oops! Surely there should be
> > more than just 90TeXDoc.cnf in texmf.d in the source tree?
> No, it seems normal. If you look at the source package for tetex-bin
> 3.0-3, you'll see only that file in texmf.d/. The other ones are
> extracted at build time by debian/split-texmf from
> texk/kpathsea/texmf.cnf. 90TeXDoc.cnf is Debian-specific, and thus
> directly copied from texmf.d/ to debian/texmf.d/.
OK, hadn't realised that. Thanks for the clarification.