Re: CVS experimental problems

[Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>]

On 22.04.05 Julian Gilbey (jdg@polya.uklinux.net) wrote:

Hi all,

> I've just noticed that only one file in tetex-bin/texmf.d checked
> out in the experimental branch.  I think there are a lot of files
> there missing the latest experimental tag - oops!  Surely there
> should be more than just 90TeXDoc.cnf in texmf.d in the source
> tree?
> 
Sure there sould. I still have here a CVS checkout as of Mar 31
15:23.

preusse@preusse ~/tetex-CVS-exp/tetex-bin.orig/debian/md5sums $ ll
total 13
-rw-r--r--  1 preusse None 177 Mar 23  2004 05TeXMF.cnf.md5sum
-rw-r--r--  1 preusse None 136 Mar 23  2004 15Plain.cnf.md5sum
-rw-r--r--  1 preusse None  92 Mar 23  2004 45TeXinputs.cnf.md5sum
-rw-r--r--  1 preusse None 136 Mar 23  2004 55Fonts.cnf.md5sum
-rw-r--r--  1 preusse None 136 Mar 23  2004 65BibTeX.cnf.md5sum
-rw-r--r--  1 preusse None  91 Mar 23  2004 75DviPS.cnf.md5sum
-rw-r--r--  1 preusse None  91 Mar 23  2004 85Misc.cnf.md5sum
-rw-r--r--  1 preusse None  87 Mar 21  2004 90TeXDoc.cnf.md5sum
-rw-r--r--  1 preusse None 255 Jan 15 22:46 95NonPath.cnf.md5sum

hence 95NonPath.cnf.md5sum should be the same as in 3.0-3.
Do you get error messages, if you try to check out? I'll try to make
a complete checkout of all trees tetex-b{in,ase}{unstable,exp} ASAP
and to clarify remaining error messages.

H.
-- 
Diplomacy is to do and say, the nastiest thing in the nicest way.
		-- Balfour