Bug#261818: marked as done (fmtutil fails on {pdf}{e}tex)
Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2004 11:32:54 +0200
with message-id <20040802093254.GC1936@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
and subject line Bug#261818: postscript to my last bug report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Apr 2004 03:23:28 +0000
>From branden@deadbeast.net Sun Apr 18 20:23:28 2004
Return-path: <branden@deadbeast.net>
Received: from necrotic.deadbeast.net [216.37.46.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BFPNY-0002lm-00; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 20:23:28 -0700
Received: by necrotic.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6909C5C05F; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:23:27 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin: package fails to configure: Error: `mpost -ini -jobname=metafun
-progname=mpost metafun.mp' failed
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:23:27 -0500
Message-Id: <20040419032327.6909C5C05F@necrotic.deadbeast.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-12
Severity: grave
The postinst fails the same way over and over again.
# dpkg --pending --configure
Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-12) ...
Regenerating /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ... done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done
Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg ... done
Running initex. This may take some time. ...
Error: `mpost -ini -jobname=metafun -progname=mpost metafun.mp' failed
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdflatex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdftex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/tex.fmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/cont-en.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/elatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/etex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mptopdf.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdfelatex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdfetex.efmt installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
###############################################################################
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
/usr/share/texmf/web2c
for details.
###############################################################################
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`mpost -ini -jobname=metafun -progname=mpost metafun.mp' failed
dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
tetex-bin
Perhaps the following chunk of the output log has something to do with it:
running `mpost -ini -jobname=metafun -progname=mpost metafun.mp' ...
This is MetaPost, Version 0.641 (Web2C 7.4.5) (INIMP)
(/usr/share/texmf/metapost/context/metafun.mp
! I can't find file `plain.mp'.
l.27 input plain.mp
; % John Hobby's file
Please type another input file name:
! Emergency stop.
l.27 input plain.mp
; % John Hobby's file
Transcript written on metafun.log.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-sparc64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.22 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.8.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dpkg 1.10.20 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii ed 0.2-20 The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.3-6 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0-7 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libkpathsea3 2.0.2-12 path search library for teTeX (run
ii libpaper1 1.1.14 Library for handling paper charact
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-5 PNG library - runtime
ii libsm6 4.3.0-7 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libt1-5 5.0.0-5 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii libwww-ssl0 [libwww0] 5.4.0-9 The W3C-WWW library (SSL support)
ii libx11-6 4.3.0-7 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxaw7 4.3.0-7 X Athena widget set library
ii libxext6 4.3.0-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxmu6 4.3.0-7 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii libxt6 4.3.0-7 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii mime-support 3.26-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii perl 5.8.3-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii sed 4.0.9-1 The GNU sed stream editor
ii tetex-base 2.0.2-6 Basic library files of teTeX
ii ucf 1.02 Update Configuration File: preserv
ii xlibs 4.3.0-7 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-5 compression library - runtime
-- debconf information:
* tetex-bin/hyphen: ngerman[=naustrian-neue_Rechtschreibung], french[=patois]
tetex-bin/oldcfg: true
* tetex-bin/upd_map: true
tetex-bin/cnf_name:
* tetex-bin/fmtutil: true
* tetex-bin/use_debconf: true
* tetex-bin/groupname: users
* tetex-bin/userperm: false
* tetex-bin/groupperm: true
* tetex-bin/lsr-perms: true
* tetex-bin/texmf: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 261818-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 09:49:10 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Mon Aug 02 02:49:10 2004
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrZRO-0000YD-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 02:49:10 -0700
Received: from [213.6.173.195] (helo=preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de)
by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.101 #44)
id 1BrZQr-00084V-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 11:48:39 +0200
Received: by preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CC3F7AE87; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 11:32:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 11:32:54 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: Anthony Campbell <ac@acampbell.org.uk>,
261818-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#261818: postscript to my last bug report
Message-ID: <20040802093254.GC1936@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
References: <[🔎] 20040802085813.GG2458@arcadia>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040802085813.GG2458@arcadia>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organization: Hilmar Preusse Inc.
X-Uptime: 08:24:36 up 7 min, 6 users, load average: 1.93, 1.05, 0.46
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.26 i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR-P2: 2 packets (155.85 stats units) [3.20 Mnodes/s]
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 261818-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On 02.08.04 Anthony Campbell (ac@acampbell.org.uk) wrote:
> OK, I found the problem: there was a language.dat file in my
> /usr/local setup, which contained an entry for ukhyph.tex. I
> removed this and all is well, so the bug should definitely be
> closed now.
>
Thanks for response. Closing now.
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: