Bug#251761: tetex-extra: caption.sty still missing despite license change

[Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>]

On 08.06.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> schrieb:

Hi all,

> > drachi:[hille] >tar tzf tetex-texmf-2.0.2.tar.gz | sort > texmf-list.orig
> > drachi:[hille] >tar tzf /usr/src/build/tetex/tetex-base_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz \
> > | sed s@tetex-base-2.0.2.orig/texmf/@@g | sort > texmf-list.debian
> > drachi:[hille] >diff texmf-list.orig texmf-list.debian|wc
> >      83     126    1704
> 
> That shows the changes we have made yet, doesn't it? But what I was
> talking about is removing files from the orig.tar.gz that we do no
> longer ship in our deb, or where we have bugs that say we shouldn't
> be shipping them.
> 
Yes, it does. There a few files we can put back in out tar.gz and
some we should take out.

> > doc/latex/fancyvrb/fvrb-ex.dvi
> > tex/latex/fancyvrb/fvrb-ex.sty
> >
> > see #177401
> 
> You know where that "conversation" took place - do you think it
> makes sense to follow up on it?
> 
I've contacted the persons in question. Hoping for response.

> > To be removed (or to be replaced by free versions): A few
> > hyphenation files (#139900), psfig.sty (#182324). Anything else?
> 
> Open bugs are:
> 
> #182324 (psfig.sty)
> #175623 (pandora font family)
> #139900 (hyphenation files)
> 
> I should be able to find out which of the non-free hyphenation
> files are still non-free, and which have been put back into
> tetex-3.0 because of a clarified/changed license.
> 
So, what should we do then: Remove just the non-free from 2.0.2 or
replace them by the free versions from 3.0?
Errm, and listing.sty can be put into the tar-ball.

> I had thought that some bugs "xxx is non-free" where resolved only
> by removing files from the deb, but I could not find any when
> looking at the archived bugs. Could well be I missed them, it's
> quite a lot.
> 

H. 
-- 
sigmentation fault