Bug#251761: tetex-extra: caption.sty still missing despite license change
On 04.06.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:
Hi all,
> > AFAICS the tar-ball of XFree 4.3.0 was lately re-released for
> > exactly the same reasons. So we could think about it. Does
> > anybody has a list of the files, we should remove and these we
> > should add?
>
> Not really, but looking at all license-related bugs should not be too
> hard.
>
drachi:[hille] >tar tzf tetex-texmf-2.0.2.tar.gz | sort > texmf-list.orig
drachi:[hille] >tar tzf /usr/src/build/tetex/tetex-base_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz \
| sed s@tetex-base-2.0.2.orig/texmf/@@g | sort > texmf-list.debian
drachi:[hille] >diff texmf-list.orig texmf-list.debian|wc
83 126 1704
a few files have another path than in the original texmf-tree. We
deliver out a few directories^1, which contain just one file:
.need_me . Why do we need these?
psfonts.map, dvipdfm.map, pdftex.map and psfonts.map are provided by
TE, but we generate them IIRC.
Finally the files contained in orig, but not in Debian tar.gz:
doc/fonts/marvosym/astro.README
doc/fonts/marvosym/euro.README
doc/fonts/marvosym/zodiac.README
are soft links to README.1st.
doc/generic/pstricks/README.pst-osci
belongs to a package which is not contained due to license problems.
(#139931 ?)
doc/latex/caption/caption.dvi
tex/latex/caption/caption.sty
that stuff in question. Can be put back.
doc/latex/fancyvrb/fvrb-ex.dvi
tex/latex/fancyvrb/fvrb-ex.sty
see #177401
fonts/source/public/gothic/suet14.mf
I guess, cause of no copyright statement at all.
tex/latex/misc/euler.sty
doc/latex/styles/euler.dvi
is put in by diff.gz. Can be put back.
To be removed (or to be replaced by free versions): A few hyphenation
files (#139900), psfig.sty (#182324). Anything else?
> The interesting question, however, is when sarge and when teTeX
> will be released. With all that discussion about the release
> policy, I have no idea whether the installer progresses as planned,
> or whether sarge will be delayed even if we vote for a timely
> release.
>
I think now uploading an new tar ball should not be that hard. I
think not, that teTeX 3.0 comes out before sarge.
H.
^1 fonts/afm/hoekwater/ fonts/bh/lucidabr/ fonts/bh/lumath/
fonts/ofm/public/ommincho/ fonts/ofm/uhc/gothic/ fonts/ofm/uhc/myoungjo/
fonts/ofm/uhc/taza/ fonts/ovf/public/ommincho/ fonts/ovf/uhc/gothic/
fonts/ovf/uhc/myoungjo/ fonts/ovf/uhc/taza/ fonts/ovp/public/ommincho/
fonts/pk/ fonts/tfm/monotype/ fonts/vf/monotype/ omega/generic/config/
omega/ocp/omegajapanese/ omega/otp/omega-j/ omega/otp/omegajapanese/
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: