Bug#251761: tetex-extra: caption.sty still missing despite license change
On 31.05.04 Atsuhito Kohda (kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp) wrote:
Hi,
> From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
> Subject: Bug#251761: tetex-extra: caption.sty still missing despite license change
> Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 22:24:46 +0200
>
> As far as I know, we had removed possible bad-license
> files from the upstream tar.gz and generated orig.tar.gz
>
Yes. Correct.
> And if some file was confirmed to be DFSG-compliant we added it
> with diff.gz, that is with patch-tmp, and you could find
> listings.sty and euler.dvi at present in patch-tmp. So caption.sty
> should be handled with the same way if it is really necessary.
>
Yes, this seems to be now up to the submitter. Should we do so or is
caption2 an acceptable substitute for you? The latest caption2 is
obsolete. In the next teTeX-release you have to use again
caption.sty.
> From: Reuben Thomas <rrt@sc3d.org>
> Subject: Bug#251761: tetex-extra: caption.sty still missing despite license change
> Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 22:39:45 +0200 (CEST)
>
> > Perhaps you could put a note about this in the package, maybe a
> > dummy caption.sty that prints out an error?
>
> I suspect this could be another fix.
>
I guess, downloading the original 2.0.2 texmf-tree, extracting the
caption-package, doc. etc and putting them into caption-tmp is more
easy and has more value to the end user.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: