Re: For the historians: Do we still need the Conflicts: on tetex-lib?
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp> schrieb:
> In potato, it was renamed as (!)tetex-lib(!) and moved
> in section libs, further, it seemed it shipped shared
> library for the first time(?).
Ah, yes, I lost potato because it's not in
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-archive/dists/.
>
> And at last, in woody, it was renamed (and splitted?)
> as libkpathsea3, libkpathsea-dev as you know.
Hm, we probably should keep it for sarge, because someone might have
upgraded from potato to woody incompletely, and left the tetex packages
untouched. Is there some policy on that?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: