Re: For the historians: Do we still need the Conflicts: on tetex-lib?

To: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: For the historians: Do we still need the Conflicts: on tetex-lib?
From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:01:13 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87n064o7k6.fsf@florent.maison>
Mail-followup-to: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87lllozuwq.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> (Frank Küster's message of "Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:41:25 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 87lllozuwq.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>

Hi,

Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:

> libkpathsea Conflicts, Provides, Replaces tetex-lib. However, I could
> not find any occurrence of tetex-lib as a non-virtual package. 
>
> Did this package ever exist in Debian (I only looked in main)? Shouldn't

The only occurrence of tetex-lib in woody and sid's
/var/lib/dpkg/available files (with main, contrib and non-free) are in
libkpathsea3's stanza: the Provides, Replaces and Conflicts you
mentioned.

> we drop this, since for sure it wasn't in the last two stable releases?

I think it is safe to drop it now. Not that I consider myself an
historian, though...

-- 
Florent

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: For the historians: Do we still need the Conflicts: on tetex-lib?
  - From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>

References:
- For the historians: Do we still need the Conflicts: on tetex-lib?
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: detex
Next by Date: Re: For the historians: Do we still need the Conflicts: on tetex-lib?
Previous by thread: For the historians: Do we still need the Conflicts: on tetex-lib?
Next by thread: Re: For the historians: Do we still need the Conflicts: on tetex-lib?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread