Re: questions regarding patch-tmp
From: frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster)
Subject: questions regarding patch-tmp
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:38:30 +0100
> * texmf.in: Why do we allow searches for files on disk instead of
> restricting searches to ls-R, as in upstream? This would speed up
> searching, and properly installed packages should regenerate ls-R
> anyway.
I forgot to mention but real stuffs to be installed
were in texmf.d/ and not texk/kpathsea/texmf.in
I don't know if there is a good method or not but I
have checked if patched texk/kpathsea/texmf.in and
one concatenated texmf.d/* were synchronized.
(but there is already Debian specific file 90TeXDoc.cnf
under texmf.d/ )
Anyway please note real stuffs are under texmf.d/
Regards, 2004-2-24(Tue)
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: