Re: questions regarding patch-tmp
Hi,
frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster) wrote:
> This is what we want:
>
> ps->ysize = vsiz ;
> + *(ps->specdat = nextstring++) = '\0' ;
> canaddtopaper = 1 ;
>
> And this is what upstream has now:
>
> ps->ysize = vsiz ;
> + ps->specdat = nextstring++ ;
> + *(ps->specdat) = 0 ;
> canaddtopaper = 1 ;
>
> It's o.k. to just keep it like that, right?
I think so.
> * texmf.in: Why do we allow searches for files on disk instead of
> restricting searches to ls-R, as in upstream? This would speed up
> searching, and properly installed packages should regenerate ls-R
> anyway.
The Debian packages do that? Ugh...
--
Florent
Reply to: