Bug#225004: tetex-extra: Type1 fonts should be in a separate package
Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> schrieb:
> frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster) wrote:
>
>> I think all we need is
>>
>> Depends: tetex-base_$next-version
>
> Perhaps also tetex-bin if you want to run updmap and so forth...
Right, I forgot that.
> Frankly, I don't think it is currently useful to have non-Type 1 fonts
> in a separate package. So the name you are proposing would seem to be a
> good idea, except that it may help maintain the confusion between the T1
> encoding and Type 1 fonts.
Good point.
> So, tetex-extra-type1fonts? And why not
> simply tetex-type1fonts or tetex-type1-fonts?
Because:
:~$ dlocate -L tetex-base | egrep 'afm|pfb' | grep [.] | wc -l
566
These fonts are probably in tetex-base because the packages they come
with are there, too. What about taking them all out?
Bye, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: