Re: plan of next upload
From: frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster)
Subject: Re: plan of next upload
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:59:27 +0100
> Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp> schrieb:
>
> > So only main fix left would be of #208408 and there
> > was a patch so would be done in a few days, I guess.
>
> As far as I see, the patch was ready to be applied. However, I might
> have missed or forgotten something while I was away.
No, I didn't think the patch was not ready to be applied.
Sorry if my mail gave you such impression ;)
I only think there are few points for which I'd like to
get confirmation of you.
1) This would be trivial but I think the following
lines should be uncommented as
+ DEFAULTS_MERGED="$DEFAULTS, $RET"
+ DEFAULT_ANS=`echo -n $DEFAULTS_MERGED | tr -d ',' | tr ' ' '\n' | sort -u | tr '\n' ',' | sed 's/,$//'`
because you already agreed to change comments
+ # If we add a default in the future, or somebody has added
+ # patterns in the buggy versions, there might be double
+ # occurences. we have to fish them out.
2) Also, I think you wrote as
+ # Every user has to see this question once again, even if he/she has
+ # yet answered the question in a previous upgrade. But this script
+ # is run again on every subsequent upgrade, and by postinst, we have
+ # to check for that.
but we used "shown_again" flag in a if-check line like
+ db_fget tetex-bin/hyphen shown_again
+ if [ "$RET" = "false" ]; then
+ db_fset tetex-bin/hyphen seen false
+ db_fset tetex-bin/hyphen shown_again true
+ fi
so I suspect there is no need to check in postinst.
But I'm not so sure on this point.
If I was wrong please let me know. And I will apply
the patch and upload the new version within this week,
at least.
BTW, I've a feeling that sarge might be released in a very
near future so it would be safe not to modify tetex-* too
much any more.
Regards, 2003-11-4(Tue)
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: