Bug#140460: marked as done (tetex-extra: it won't install - config fails)
Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:50:58 +0200
with message-id <20030905095058.GA1012@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
and subject line Bug#140460: Bug#172517: Bug#140460: tetex-extra: it won't install, config fails - additional info from cont-en.log
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2002 15:15:36 +0000
>From hramrach@uvt407-5.ruk.cuni.cz Fri Mar 29 09:15:36 2002
Return-path: <hramrach@uvt407-5.ruk.cuni.cz>
Received: from uvt407-5.ruk.cuni.cz (localhost) [195.113.2.105]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16qy6K-0000op-00; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:15:36 -0600
Received: from hramrach by localhost with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 16qz6F-00006n-00; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:19:35 +0100
From: Michal `hramrach' Suchanek <hramrach@uvt407-5.ruk.cuni.cz>
Subject: tetex-extra: it won't install - config fails
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <E16qz6F-00006n-00@localhost>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:19:35 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20011202-2
Severity: important
I tried to install the hydra because part of its functionality
is needed for mutt. Some obscure parts failed to configure:
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
tetex-extra
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/10.5MB of archives. After unpacking 31.5MB will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-extra.
(Reading database ... 18608 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tetex-extra (from .../tetex-extra_1.0.2+20011202-2_all.deb) ...
Setting up tetex-extra (1.0.2+20011202-2) ...
texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/spool/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Done.
Running initex for missing formats. This may take some time. ...
Error: `omega -ini -fmt=omega -progname=omega omega.ini' failed
Error: `omega -ini -fmt=lambda -progname=lambda lambda.ini' failed
###############################################################################
fmtutil: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully.
Visit the log files in directory
/usr/share/texmf/web2c
for details.
###############################################################################
This is a summary of all `failed' messages:
`omega -ini -fmt=omega -progname=omega omega.ini' failed
`omega -ini -fmt=lambda -progname=lambda lambda.ini' failed
dpkg: error processing tetex-extra (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
tetex-extra
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
********************************************************************************
I can post the logs somewhere if wanted(cca 540 lines)
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: GNU hurd 0.2 GNUmach-1.2/Hurd-0.2 i386-AT386 unknown
Versions of the packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg 1.9.17 Package maintenance system for Debian
ii gsfonts 6.0-2 Fonts for the ghostscript interpreter
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20011202 basic teTeX library files
ii tetex-bin 1.0.7+20001218 teTeX binary files
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 140460-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2003 10:21:23 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Fri Sep 05 05:20:48 2003
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp02.web.de (smtp.web.de) [217.72.192.151]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19vDhw-0002vN-00; Fri, 05 Sep 2003 05:20:48 -0500
Received: from [80.184.44.105] (helo=preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de)
by smtp.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.99 #448)
id 19vDhu-00026b-00; Fri, 05 Sep 2003 12:20:46 +0200
Received: by preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id ECD554746; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:50:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:50:58 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: Gaetano Paolone <bigpaul@linuxfaq.it>,
140460-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#140460: Bug#172517: Bug#140460: tetex-extra: it won't install, config fails - additional info from cont-en.log
Message-ID: <20030905095058.GA1012@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
References: <20021220.180538.45519382.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp> <200212201031.34267.Geert.Jan.Hut@hutsoftware.nl> <20021220134759.742e293f.bigpaul@debian.org> <20021220.235607.104039556.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp> <20021220173551.22275e66.bigpaul@debian.org> <20021223215133.3868e6e6.bigpaul@debian.org> <87znigkwyd.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> <20030812104753.GB14888@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de> <[🔎] 20030904112210.GC31186@monique>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20030904112210.GC31186@monique>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Organization: Hilmar Preusse Inc.
X-Uptime: 11:40:58 up 1 min, 3 users, load average: 1.11, 0.34, 0.12
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.21 i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR: 23 packets (1715.48 stats units) [2.33 Mnodes/s]
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 140460-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.3 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On 04.09.03 Gaetano Paolone (bigpaul@linuxfaq.it) wrote:
> * il Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 12:47:53PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse scriveva:
> > On 11.08.03 Frank Küster (frank@kuesterei.ch) wrote:
>
> > > This was half a year ago, and #172517 has been closed even longer.
> > > So am I correct that this bug has merely been forgotten, and can be
> > > closed?
> > >
> > Lets see: The Bug of one of the Follow-uppers was solved, but the
> > original submitter never reacted. So we can't really say if that bug
> > is solved. I put him in Cc: hoping for reply. If he doesn't react or
> > we even get a bounce we should close that bug.
>
> I think bug can be closed.
> Gaetano
>
So closing. If anybody don't like that decision he should reopen.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: