Bug#131554: marked as done (tetex-bin: doesn't install; can't find config file for pdftex (pdftex.cfg))
Your message dated Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:27:30 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20031022.082730.1649781530.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line not a tetex bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2002 16:46:54 +0000
>From moses@margot.mozai.com Wed Jan 30 10:46:54 2002
Return-path: <moses@margot.mozai.com>
Received: from (margot.mozai.com) [205.233.216.235]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Vxsr-0003vF-00; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:46:53 -0600
Received: from izzy.mozai.com (izzy.mozai.com [205.233.216.234])
by margot.mozai.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) with ESMTP id g0UGkq6n013951;
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:46:52 -0500
Received: from moses by izzy.mozai.com with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 18IAlU-0001yo-00; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:46:48 -0500
From: Moses Moore <moses@margot.mozai.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin: doesn't install; can't find config file for pdftex (pdftex.cfg)
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.14213
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:46:48 -0500
Message-Id: <E18IAlU-0001yo-00@izzy.mozai.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-bin
Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-30
Severity: important
Trying to apt-get install tetex-bin/testing, and I get the following
error:
teTeX setup utility
Could not find default config file for pdftex (pdftex.cfg).
The programm[sic] will exit now.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux izzy 2.4.17 #3 SMP Sun Jan 20 14:38:39 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 131554-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2003 23:27:41 +0000
>From kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp Tue Oct 21 18:27:40 2003
Return-path: <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Received: from nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp [150.59.48.142]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AC5ue-0004RA-00; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:27:40 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by nsx.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AC5uW-00052d-00; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:27:32 +0900
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:27:30 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20031022.082730.1649781530.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
To: 149112-done@bugs.debian.org, 131554-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: not a tetex bug
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] handler.214824.D214824.106604767917635.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanner: exiscan *1AC5uW-00052d-00*5FJEh5R1zI.*
Delivered-To: 131554-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Subject: Bug#214824: marked as done (tetex-bin: fails to install ("Could not find default config file for pdftex"))
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 07:38:08 -0500
> pdftex.cfg is a conffile so unless the scripts removed it
> it should remain untill tetex-base was purged but there
> is no such code in the scripts.
>
> Further there were similar bugs with various conffiles,
> from time to time, for recent example, Bug#208311(dvipdfm).
>
> If these are really bugs of tetex packages, there would
> be much more users who encounter these and would be reproducible.
> But not so in fact.
>
> Further, because these were not unproducible, we can't investigate
> these so I can't prove these are not bugs but I suspect these
> are accidents, in a sense.
>
> So I close this but if you or anyone else get the same
> bug, anyone can reopen this or file a new bug.
With the same reason, I close the bugs.
Regards, 2003-10-22(Wed)
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: