Bug#119531: latex/3568: inclusion wish for latin10.def
On 26.08.03 Frank (latex-bugs@latex-project.org) wrote:
Good morning,
> similarly \euro is wrong as it should be \texteuro which is the
> official LICR (the fact that some package uses different a name is
> irrelevant (just like the fact that i also prefer typing \euro to
> \texteuro :-)
>
Thats what I mentioned in my report. char #164 can probably replaced
by \texteuro . In any case the commented line for #164 should be
kicked out.
> ps what is meant by:
>
> %%
> %% Latin10 is also coming with support for the German double quotations.
> %% You have to use babel with a language that support those quotations,
> %% German and Romanian come now in my mind...
> %%
>
Probably
\DeclareInputText{171}{\quotedblbase}
which generates quotation marks via input enconding.
> pps:
>
> > %% The comma below accent for S, s, T and t doesn't look good
> > %% for large characters. A solution would be to include internal
> > %% support for comma below in the same way like for the dot below,
> > %% so \C{t} to create the t comma below, etc.
>
> that might be possible after we have agreed on the LICR name,
> nevertheless a \providecommand is probably in order and it might be
> the best to start out in this way
>
For clarification: An LIRC name makes it possible to use that
character even without using the input enconding, which is otherwise
impossible.
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: