Re: report of tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202-8
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:41:14PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I could upload tetex-bin as a non-native Debian package
> with luck.
>
> First, I had failed to upload it because *.orig.tar.gz was not
> in Debian archive. I should have built the package with
> the option '-sa' perhaps.
>
> So I manually put files with scp and it seemed to work fine.
You have to ensure that the .changes file contains information on this
file. Do try running "dinstall -n" on the .changes file.
> During the process, I noticed a problem.
>
> In prerm, isn't it better to surround
>
> update-alternatives --remove xdvi.bin /usr/bin/xdvi.real
> update-alternatives --remove oxdvi.bin /usr/bin/oxdvi.real
>
> with if-close, for example, like
>
> if [ "$1" != "upgrade" ]
> then
> update-alternatives --remove xdvi.bin /usr/bin/xdvi.real
> update-alternatives --remove oxdvi.bin /usr/bin/oxdvi.real
> fi
>
> I usally set alternatives for xdvi.bin but lost it
> after upgrading.
Yes, that looks like a sensible improvement.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
website: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
Reply to: