[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#132459: suggested workaround does not work



In this article

http://lists.debian.org/debian-tetex-maint/2002/debian-tetex-maint-200203/msg00220.html

Barak Pearlmutter <bap@snot.cs.unm.edu> suggests that
 dvips -Ppdf -G0 ...  
 dvips -Pcmz ...

But it doesn't work in the latest stable (3.0, woody).  I purged dvips &
company and reinstalled.  This is what results:

I'm running 
dvips -Ppdf -G0 -o file.ps file.dvi

it gives output like this:
This is dvips(k) 5.86e Copyright 2001 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2002.08.14:1146' -> catavault.system.docs.ps
kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000
--dpi 8000 ecbx2074
mktexpk: Mismatched mode ljfour and resolution 8000; ignoring mode.
mktexpk: Can't guess mode for 8000 dpi devices.
mktexpk: Use a config file, or update me.
kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log.
dvips: Font ecbx2074 at 8000 not found; scaling 600 instead.
dvips: Such scaling will generate extremely poor output.
kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000
--dpi 8000 ecrm1000
mktexpk: Mismatched mode ljfour and resolution 8000; ignoring mode.
mktexpk: Can't guess mode for 8000 dpi devices.
mktexpk: Use a config file, or update me.

Then I run
ps2pdf file.ps file.pdf

and xpdf says it has Type 3 fonts in it that it can't deal with.

ditto for the command
$ dvips -Pcmz -o catavault.system.docs.ps catavault.system.docs.dvi
This is dvips(k) 5.86e Copyright 2001 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2002.08.14:1146' -> catavault.system.docs.ps
<texc.pro><texps.pro><special.pro>. <msam7.pfb><cmsy10.pfb>[1
<../logos/linuxforce.eps>] [1] [1] [2] [3] [4]
[5<../logos/linuxlogo.eps>
<../logos/adminforce.eps>] 

How to get nice Type 1 font output?

-- 
Christopher J. Fearnley     |   AdminForce Remote, LLC
cjf@AdminForce.net          |   President and CTO
http://www.AdminForce.net   |   Design Science Revolutionary
               "Dare to be Naïve" -- Bucky Fuller



Reply to: