Bug#64914: none
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmul.ac.uk>
Subject: Bug#64914: none
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 22:53:23 +0000
> > > They are in /etc, so they'll have to be configuration files, I guess.
> >
> > Yes if they are shipped as real files. But no if 10jadetex.cnf
> > is generated with postinst like (only for example);
>
> Please reread policy section 11.7: a conffile is shipped as a normal
> file and is marked as a conffile for dpkg to handle. A configuration
> file has to be handled by maintainer scripts and sysadmin changes must
> be preserved.
Ah, sorry I overlooked your phrase "configuration files"
and misread it as if it were "conffiles".
I understand now your point.
> > I guess if 05jadetex is created by the postinst and not a
> > real file then it can be handled more simply as above.
>
> Not really :-(
I misunderstood this point completely. I thought that a
configuration file generated with postinst could be handled
freely at any time in any way but the policy said clearly;
Configuration file handling must conform to the following behavior:
* local changes must be preserved during a package upgrade, and
* configuration files must be preserved when the package is
removed, and only deleted when the package is purged.
Thanks for your clarification.
Note only one point that update-fmtutil reads only
/etc/texmf/fmt.d/*.cnf so renaming 05jadetex.ignore
will be sufficient anyway.
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore-devel.com>
Subject: Bug#64914: none
Date: 21 Mar 2002 18:31:08 -0500
> Look, it's really no problem to handle non-conffiles in /etc/ (e.g.,
> copied) by the maintainer scripts. So don't worry about it... Just
> get those changes in tetex in the easiest practical way and don't
> worry too much about me.
Yes, yes, I belive you. I only want to share the consistent
understanding on this issue. Sorry for my noise ;-)
# I believe that fixed tetex-bin is in a final step.
Best regards, 2002.3.22
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
Reply to: