[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#64914: none



From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmul.ac.uk>
Subject: Bug#64914: none
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:24:27 +0000

> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:32:31AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > > Right.  I would got for both as conffiles.
> > 
> > You mean both files are registered as conffiles?
> > Then they will remain in a system after when a user 
> > removes jadetex.  I guess this might be a problem.
> 
> Yes, and no and erm.
> 
> They are in /etc, so they'll have to be configuration files, I guess.

Yes if they are shipped as real files.  But no if 10jadetex.cnf
is generated with postinst like (only for example);

cat > /etc/texmf/fmt.d/00jadetex.cnf << EOF
some stuffs
EOF

or

cp /usr/share/doc/jadetex/examples/00jadetex.cnf /etc/texmf/fmt.d/

or something appropriate way.

Then, I guess, jadetex can remove 00jadetex.cnf safely
on removal (with prerm perhaps).

> Suggested solution:
> 
> fmtutil should only read files whose names are of the form
> 
> [0-9][0-9][A-Za-z0-9]+
> 
> Then on removal, jadetex should move its fmtutil files to something
> like 05jadetex.ignore.  On install, if such a file exists, it is moved
> to 05jadetex, otherwise 05jadetex is created by the postinst.

I guess if 05jadetex is created by the postinst and not a
real file then it can be handled more simply as above.

Best regards,			 2002.3.22

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.



Reply to: