On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 01:35:27PM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote: > Am Mon, 2002-03-04 um 10.43 schrieb Julian Gilbey: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:20:01AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > > > From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmul.ac.uk> > > > Subject: Re: Bug#134260: package writes to /usr/share during build > > > Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 22:56:43 +0000 > > > > It is serious if it means that the autobuilders won't build it. > > > To tell the truth, I couldn't understand but, > > > From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org> > > > Subject: Re: Bug#134260: package writes to /usr/share during build > > > Date: 26 Feb 2002 00:24:04 +0000 > > > > It's worth idly noting, btw, that every single active auto-builder > > > > manager to build the tetex-bin you're bug is about btw ;-) (And many > > > > of them use fakeroot...) > > > does this mean autobuilders work well or don't work? > > Sounds to me that if they use fakeroot, they won't be able to > > autobuild it if it writes to /usr/share. > It was my impression, that the problem was with ash and not with sh. And > since no autobuilder admin ever complained about it and we did not > introduce this recently ... Correct. As much as ash-compatibility might be nice, it is by no means a default in Debian, and I see no reason that this should be RC. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpMwH8jVs1V9.pgp
Description: PGP signature