Bug#108588: Reverse search
Please send or, at least, CC to 108588-maintonly@bugs.debian.org
because there are many experts there.
From: Djalil Chafai <djalil.chafai@laposte.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#108588: Reverse search
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 03:59:44 +0200
> > Well, does xdvi support \srcspecial already?
> >
> > # When I investigated it seemed xdvi did not support \srcspecial.
>
> Hi,
>
> Actually, there are some efforts, take a look at :
>
> ftp://ftp.cis.uni-muenchen.de/pub/ulrich/src-specials/
I see. It seems the above modifies xdvi to support src-special.
Generally, it needs to incorporate tetex with
ftp://ftp.cstug.cz/pub/tex/local/cstug/thanh/pdftex/tetex-supp.tgz
to support src-special as far as I know (is this right?).
And also it needs efforts in the above site for xdvi.
Considering these, I feel it might be too difficult to
support src-special now.
Of course, if it is not so difficult, I agree to support
src-special.
By the way, I can not got what you wanted to say with
> The main problem is that *dvi authors say symmetricaly that Unix TeX
> engines did not includes \srcspecials !
Please someone clarify the above sentence for me.
Best regards, 2001.8.17
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
Reply to: