[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PLAN failed strangely



Hi Hendrik,

On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:26:05PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Or is there a possible hardware problem -- one that lets Linux
> work fine, lets Windows format partitions correctly, but does
> not let it install?  I did have a motherboard replaced recently.

hm, I've heard, it's more the other way around with resp. to hardware
problems: Windows works "fine" and Linux shows some strange behavior now
and then. (Think of kernel compiling, heavy load etc.)

> It can't have formatted the whole disk (though I was worrked at the time),
> because both Linuxes still boot fine.  Windows' C: partition is perfectly
> readable and writable by Linux, and is empty.
> 
> In case it's still of interest, this is the output of fdisk -l:
> 
> Disk /dev/hda: 80.0 GB, 80054059008 bytes
> 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 155114 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
> 
>    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/hda1   *           1       24975    12586896    c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/hda2           25022      111563    43617168    5  Extended
> /dev/hda3          113460      130114     8393962+  83  Linux
> /dev/hda4          138450      155104     8393962+  83  Linux
> /dev/hda5           25022       29150     2080417+   c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/hda6           31206       41550     5213092+   c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/hda7           43590       45661     1044225    c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/hda8           49710       55941     3140707+   c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/hda9           60037       66269     3140707+   c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/hda10          70365       78684     4192965    c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/hda11          86971       93203     3140707+   c  W95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/hda12         109953      111563      811282+  82  Linux swap
> lovesong:/home/hendrik#

Well, to me the 7 FAT32 partitions look weired. Do you need them? Maybe this
is even the reason for the failing Windows install. Maybe WinME can't cope
with so much partitions, but the error message doesn't show this.

I would delete them, maybe even the swap partition, extend the extended
partition to the end of the disk. (You maybe could put swap there; I don't
know yet, if it can be placed inside an ext. part.)

Hm, you could try another thing. IIRC I've read something that (especially)
WinME is very picky about partitions. I think there was something about
hiding all (?) other partitions before booting ME. I haven't found, if LILO
can do this per boot, maybe you have to use grub for that.

You could try to hide all partitions manually, install WinME and unhide them
afterward. Maybe it will boot and don't care about the other partitions.

If this doesn't work (install-wise) and you are very willing to experiment,
you could to note down the start and stop of each other partition, delete
them except the first one (for WinME) and install it (hoping WinME will not
claim all the space). After that putting back the partition information.
(Maybe fdisk has some kind of import/export function.)

> sarge is on /dev/hda3,
> woody is on /dev/hda4,
> and Windows is NOT on /dav/hda1

Let us hear from your results. :)

Greetings,
 Mike



Reply to: