Re: Upgrade report: Test Cycle 2
- To: Raphael Hertzog <rhertzog@hrnet.fr>
- Cc: Sven Hartrumpf <sven.hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de>, debian-testing@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, "J.A. Bezemer" <costar@panic.et.tudelft.nl>
- Subject: Re: Upgrade report: Test Cycle 2
- From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:35:55 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20000615193555.A2999@mors.wiggy.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Raphael Hertzog <rhertzog@hrnet.fr>, Sven Hartrumpf <sven.hartrumpf@FernUni-Hagen.de>, debian-testing@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, "J.A. Bezemer" <costar@panic.et.tudelft.nl>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000615151215.A2599@solo>; from rhertzog@hrnet.fr on Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 03:12:15PM +0200
- References: <[🔎] 14664.38664.91218.7234@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <[🔎] 20000615151215.A2599@solo>
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> We already had such a problem in the first version of static dpkg that we
> provided on Anne's page, but I recompiled it and it should be ok now ...
> unless the bad one has been installed...
Grmbl. Do people test things before they upload? I'm going to be extremely
annoyed if I get bugreports from people using a miscompiled static dpkg
package..
Wichert.
--
________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpBlhwegQpjX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: