[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian-9.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso (rel 2018-02-16T23:09:00) Networking issues on Blade 150



Frank,

Could you try the following in obp:
cd /pci@1f,0/ebus@c/eeprom@1,0
fff4bfd0 30 dump
and tell me the numbers in fff4bfd8 and fff4bfd9, I would like to know
if it's 01 80 or 01 83

thank you

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Frank Scheiner <frank.scheiner@web.de> wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> On 02/21/2018 08:39 PM, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
>>
>> * Is there a chance that your local DHCP setup is not working properly?
>> I highly doubt it, as it works well for another operating system on
>> this blade, although after the dhcp client failure from the installer,
>> I chose the option to setup the ip address manually, but it was unable
>> to succeed doing so.
>
>
> What does your DHCP server log when you're trying the IP auto-configuration
> from the installer? Compare it with what happens when this is done on
> Solaris.
>
>>
>> Do you think the nvram swap caused this issue, and should I reprogram
>> the chip to its former mac address?
>
>
> No, not really, I actually expect it to work with any MAC address, although
> it could make problems to use a MAC address not from Sun's MAC address
> blocks, but that's not the case for you. I just wondered about the how. :-)
>
> But you could give it a try, of course. While there's no mkp/mkpl in v4.x
> OBP, it could work using the description on [1]. Also the Sun NVRAM/hostid
> FAQ ([2]) mentions this method. But I haven't tried this yet for myself, so
> no guarantee that it will work.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/MrSparc/idprom-repair
> [2]: http://www.obsolyte.com/sunFAQ/faq_nvram.html#arcane
>
> But maybe it's not worth the effort to go back to the original MAC address
> if the machine works well with Solaris.
>
> Did you reset the OBP environment vars after you installed the new NVRAM
> into your Blade 150? If it was programmed in another Sun machine (not a
> Blade 150 but e.g. a Sun Enterprise 250), it could contain garbage from the
> other machine.
>
> Cheers,
> Frank


Reply to: