[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sun Blade 100, problems with DVD drive



You were right, DVD+RW is not supported by this drive.
However CD-RW is and still, i cannot boot up neither FreeBSD 11, nor Debian 9. Any idea why?
(Hitachi GD-7000 docs are here: http://h10032.www1.hp.com/ctg/Manual/bph06479)

Kevin Stabel <kevin.stabel@gmail.com> írta:
>If you don&#39;t mind the cost of one disc, you could.If you do mind the cost, you could try to look up what your drive supports.On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 5:11 PM, transmail transmail@freemail.hu> wrote:Yes, it is. It&#39;s a DVD+RW. And both the FreeBSD and Debian CD-s i tried to boot up were CD-RW. Should i try CD-R and DVD-R?
>
>Kevin Stabel kevin.stabel@gmail.com> írta:
>>This is a burned DVD yeah?It could actually be a fairly obscure issue, namely DVD-R vs DVD+RPlease have a look here: https://pc.net/helpcenter/answers/different_dvd_r_formatsOn Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 4:51 PM, transmail transmail@freemail.hu> wrote:I&amp;#39;ve tried to set auto-boot? to false but it&amp;#39;s still ejecting my Solaris DVD. What can cause this?
>>
>>Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl.debian-sparc@telemetry.co.uk> írta:
>>>On 09/04/17 12:00, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>>> That&amp;#39;s not a proof that this drive works. Try reading a known good medium, e.g. a commercially pressed CD and see if that works.
>>>>
>>>> And, even if that works, it could still be that the old CD-ROM drive in your SPARC doesn&amp;#39;t handle CD-Rs.
>>>>
>>>> You really need to make sure the drive can deal with the CDs you&amp;#39;ve created. Testing them on a modern drive is moot. Modern drives are more tolerant with CD-Rs and CD-RWs.
>>>
>>>I think that system had a comparatively-recent IDE-connected DVD, but
>>>mine&amp;#39;s somewhere waiting to be scrapped and I&amp;#39;m afraid I&amp;#39;m not going
>>>digging for it.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Mark Morgan Lloyd
>>>markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
>>>
>>>[Opinions above are the author&amp;#39;s, not those of his employers or colleagues]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply to: