[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: elfutils and libgc FTBFS
To
: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
>, debian-sparc <
debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
>
Subject
: Re: elfutils and libgc FTBFS
From
: Romain Dolbeau <
romain@dolbeau.org
>
Date
: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:41:37 +0100
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
CADuzgbqUkKubKcnNb16WhEJQAEt2PG5C8TxHF1DkxJ0UWi-y+A@mail.gmail.com
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
564EF7D1.6000105@physik.fu-berlin.de
>
References
: <
[🔎]
564EECDD.7040702@physik.fu-berlin.de
> <
[🔎]
CADuzgbpPk3pztMgrFjcGqNfZLCA6VrEf8Sd8aOG2hTfYx+q9yg@mail.gmail.com
> <
[🔎]
564EF7D1.6000105@physik.fu-berlin.de
>
2015-11-20 11:37 GMT+01:00 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<
glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
>
:
I'm not sure whether I understand the difference. Are those different
compiler options?
Yes. From <
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html
>,
"The -fPIC choice always works, but may produce larger code than -fpic".
Presumably a different way of relocating, more amenable to large amount of code.
Cordially,
--
Romain Dolbeau
Reply to:
debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Romain Dolbeau (on-list)
Romain Dolbeau (off-list)
References
:
elfutils and libgc FTBFS
From:
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Re: elfutils and libgc FTBFS
From:
Romain Dolbeau <romain@dolbeau.org>
Re: elfutils and libgc FTBFS
From:
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Prev by Date:
Re: elfutils and libgc FTBFS
Next by Date:
Re: elfutils and libgc FTBFS
Previous by thread:
Re: elfutils and libgc FTBFS
Next by thread:
Re: elfutils and libgc FTBFS
Index(es):
Date
Thread