[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SPARC daily d-i builds


am Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:53:59AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org> (11/01/2011):
> > As all my attempts to find someone willing to setup d-i daily builds
> > on a sparc buildd [1] failed. I'm going to give up now and will not
> > bother you again until some steps up to do the necessary work or
> > provide me with buildd access. I added the following note to the d-i
> > daily builds overview page: Due to the lack of porter and buildd
> > admin interest there are currently no daily builds for the SPARC
> > architecture. These builds will be reenable as soon as someone finds
> > the time to do the necessary buildd setup.
> > 
> > I would also be willing to do the neccessary setup myself if someone
> > provides me with the necessary access to a sparc buildd.
> So, again, it's not about lack of interest, it's about lack of time.
> Also, you could have pinged debian-wb-team@. I believe aba did most of
> the d-i autobuilding stuff, so he might have some clue to share. I've
> added this list to the loop.

and I did tell on #d-boot the following on Nov 13 2010:

15:27 < trave11er> ok, we didn't get any reply from stappers, so sparc dailies still have the old kernels, afaict
15:31 < otavio> trave11er: buildd people were going to put sparc into it
15:31 < otavio> trave11er: dunno if it has been done
15:31 < otavio> adsb: ^?
15:33 < phil> otavio: "were going to" is quite untrue.  There still isn't a bug
report, and I did report the result of my investigation, i.e. there's no space
on the only LVMed sparc buildd we have.
15:37 < otavio> phil: I didn't recall about the space issue
15:37 < otavio> phil: indeed

So meh, whatever.  To my knowledge that's still true.  We currently don't have
the capacities and we admitted that.  Furthermore not asking -wb-team might
not give you answers, indeed.  Sorry if I missed something along the way.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: