[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PCI cards on Ultra5



Admar Schoonen wrote:
Hi,

On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 07:59:19PM +0200, Christian Euler wrote:
Hi Geert,

Is there anything special about PCI support on UltraSparc?
Not as far I known.

I think the original poster is encountering hardware defects.

Hardware test to preform:
* place a known to be working PCI (Network) card in the Ultra 5

* place the PCI USB card in known to be working PCI slot.
I ripped the USB card off my wife's PC (where it was working fine).
I also tried other cards on the Ultra, without success.

The machine itself runs pretty stable, I used it for about 8 hours yesterday
without any glitches. So I don't want to talk about a hardware problem yet. ;)

There are various success and fail stories of putting USB PCI cards in Ultra
5's. I once heard that U5's only like PCI 2.1 cards and not 2.2 (see e.g.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2007/12/msg00012.html). Don't know if it's
true.

You might try a different USB card.

HTH

Admar

My recollection of the previous discussion was that some cards, believed to be PCI 2.2, locked up a PCI-Based SPARC system (possibly an Ultra-5) without any detectable activity. It was surmised that the SPARC system was compatible with PCI 2.1 but not with 2.2.

Having recently had a very similar problem on some Compaq x86 systems with much-newer PCI USB cards fitted, i.e. the computer was either dead or booted a small number of times and then died, I believe that PCI compatibility might be a major issue.

However the OP (Christian) did have a system that ran, so it might in practice be the usual sort of driver problem rather than a fundamental incompatibility.

My advice would be to keep an eye on eBay looking for older/slower USB cards, i.e. /not/ 480Mbit/sec v2. I know it shouldn't happen but in my experience peripherals always work best with machines roughly comparable with what was current when they were designed and tested.

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]


Reply to: