Re: Any progress?
I don't see how the users are getting lost. Almost all emails clearly
describe on what kind of machine the issue is seen. That immediately
makes it clear wether it's sparc 32 or 64.
For those interested in sparc32, a usefull mailing list to subscribe to
With all respect for the good intentions, we don't need another ML.
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:26:20PM +0100, Chris Andrew wrote:
> You may be right, but it seems hat sparc (32) users are understandably
> getting lost, because the interest is in sparc64. If nobody is
> interested (or are unable) to work on 32-bit stuff, then maybe a new
> list is what is needed. Hence the point about Debian having a
> separate sparc (32) port.
> I'm reluctant to say more, as the sparc developers will tell me that I
> can say this as much as I want, but it won't change the fact that
> nobody is able to support 32-bit.
> On 08/10/2007, Julien Cristau <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at 19:26:49 +0100, Chris Andrew wrote:
> > > Hi, Julien.
> > >
> > > People have mentioned sparc (32) becoming a separate port on Debian,
> > > so that we can rally the troops and make a concerted effort. This
> > > idea seems not to be of any interest, so I think that it is good that
> > > this list has been created. We need to get a greater readership,
> > > though. Not sure how.
> > >
> > Right, and I'm saying that using a new list with no subscribers isn't
> > the greatest idea if you want to get a broader readership. IMHO, YMMV,
> > etc.