[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Etch installation on Sun Blade 100 - magic for /etc/silo.conf needed



Hello all,

A long and tortuous tale. A Sun Blade 100 which had a Debian Sarge 
installation on failed with initially lots of network errors 
occurring in the logs. An attempted upgrade in place to Etch failed for 
various reasons (mostly my user incompetence :( then the saga below 
followed.) 

The result was 9 1/2 hours of frustration ending at 21.00 on a 
Friday night :(

Machine is a stock Sun Blade with 256MB of memory, 20GB hard drive.

Etch 4.0r0 official release netboot media fails - Boot from CD rom from 
SILO succeeds, then machine hangs trying to boot Linux. This is 2.6.18-4
Same goes for CD #1

Similar vintage Ubuntu Feisty Fawn installer succeeds beyond this point 
- the ramdisk is a different size, it may be that the installed modules 
are different. Boots 2.6.20. Ubuntu allowed us to partition the disk
and label as below

/dev/hda1  512M /boot boot
/dev/hda2 19GB / root
/dev/hda3 512M swap

It died at about 85% installed :(

Gentoo install image liveCD (choice of 2.6.16 / 2.6.16) allows us to 
chroot into an installed system. So we debootstrapped :)

Debootstrap got us a Debian - but doesn't appear to configure 
/etc/silo.conf properly.

As far as I can tell, we have a valid Debian system on /dev/hda2 with
/boot on /dev/hda1 - but no means of divining the SILO magic needed to 
get them to boot.

SILO boots, kernel loads then fails saying /dev/hda2 isn't recognised as
valid

The machine is not Internet connected. Various Googling for valid 
/etc/silo.conf revealed that SILO is just badly documented :(

Can anyone share the magic needed to get SILO to boot on one of these 
machines. Once we can boot it, we can amend silo.conf and carry on from 
there. A sarge bare basic install from CD ROM is also feasible if 
necessary.

With many thanks for any and all help. 

Andy

[The machine is not readily accessible to me at all times:
unfortunately, I can't post more detailed error messages readily.]





Reply to: