On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:06:37 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > like this one. And no, ladies and gentlemen; the GPL is *not* a valid > license for binary firmware. The key wording here is "The source code for I should be more explicit; I'm talking about binary-only firmware. Obviously, if the firmware source is made available, the GPL is a fine choice of license.