Re: sparc developer machines
Another poster brought up a good point: what would the disk size
requirements be for such a machine?
a
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 08:25:51PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a part of etch release qualifications [0], sparc must have at least one
> (preferrably more) developer- and porter- accessible machines. As
> vore seems to be intermittently down with hardware problems, it is
> the current showstopper for sparc, as pointed out by Steve Langasek. So,
> in order to meet this requirement we need some machine(s) and some
> hosting. It looks like the latter is harder to come by than the former.
> General requirements for such a machine, outlined by Steve are:
>
> 1. Colocated, with a reasonable expectation that the hosting arrangement
> is good in the medium-term. Remote console or power control is a plus.
>
> 2. A competent local admin.
>
> 3. A reliable net connection (in particular, hosting it at home on a
> DSL/cable line will not cut it, even though the bandwidth requirements
> for it are likely to be much less stringent than for a buildd). It also
> should not be too heavily firewalled or proxied.
>
> If you have any ideas on how to arrange something like this, please let
> the list know.
>
> [0] http://wiki.debian.org/sparcEtchReleaseRecertification
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jurij Smakov jurij@wooyd.org
> Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: