Re: [HELP] [PORT] sparc vs sparc5 vs ultrasparc?
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:54:10AM -0500, James A. Morrison wrote:
>
> > "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org> writes:
> > > ultrasparc:
> > >
> > > CC = gcc
> > > CXX = g++
> > > CFLAGS = -mv8 -mtune=ultrasparc ... # the rest is the same as sparc
> >
> > These should be fine for Sarge on SPARC. v8 is the default
> > instruction set for Sarge and tuning for ultrasparc isn't such a bad
> > thing.
>
> Thanks. What does "default instruction set" mean? I *am* providing a
> library compiled with only -O2. What I'm looking for here is to
> provide an optimized library *too*. From my understanding this can
> make a significant difference on Sparc. Should I use -mv9 for that?
>
> Marcelo
-mcpu=ultrasparc would be good for the optimized libraries.
--
Thanks,
Jim
http://www.student.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~ja2morri/
http://phython.blogspot.com
http://open.nit.ca/wiki/?page=jim
Reply to: