Re: security fixes for woody sparc kernels?
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:46:08PM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > I uploaded 2.5.24 (or was it 2.4.25?). It should be in proposed-updates.
>
> I found a package of kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64, version 34.woody.1.
> (Is this the one you meant?) But trying to install it gives a large
> number of depmod errors:
>
> alcyone[23]:~# dpkg -i kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64_34.woody.1_sparc.deb
> Selecting previously deselected package kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64.
> (Reading database ... 8501 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64 (from kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64_34.woody.1_sparc.deb) ...
> Setting up kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64 (34.woody.1) ...
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.24-sparc64/kernel/arch/sparc64/solaris/solaris.o
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.24-sparc64/kernel/crypto/aes.o
> [many lines of errors snipped...]
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.24-sparc64/kernel/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.o
> There was a problem running depmod. This may be benign,
> (You may have versioned symbol names, for instance).
> Or this could be an error.
> depmod exited with return value 1
> In any case, since depmod is run at install time,
> we could just defer running depmod
> Would you like to abort now? [Yes] yes
>
>
> Looks like it's been filed at http://bugs.debian.org/234442 . Should I be
> worried, or go ahead and install it?
Don't sweat it. It's all good. Make sure you also install the new silo
from proposed-updates aswell.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Reply to: