Re: 2.5.40 on Sunblade 100 (was Re: NCPFS, anyone?)
> I thought GCC 3.1 and above are OK for compiling kernels on
> Ultrasparc. I also thought the IDE drivers were from the 2.4 series
> and should be stable. Will I have to eat my words there too?
egcs64 has always been the suggested way to compile kernels from
ultrasparc. Nothing else has ever been suggested or supported up to this
point.
However, I think Dave is making it a point to get gcc-3.2 able to build
kernels.
As for 2.5.40 on Blade100, I just got a kernel built on mine, and I'm
about to reboot myself.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
Reply to: