Re: gcc working on sparc?
Ben Collins wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 06:38:40PM +0000, Mike Moran wrote:
> >
> > This seems something of a chore, but I guess I'll have to do it. How
> > often do such misalignments occur when using apt-get update/upgrade
> > primarily for security updates? I would have thought it would make sense
> > to place related updates on the server in one go, no?
> >
>
> Well if you got this from security.debian.org, then it seems to me that
> they have the libc6 package and not the libc6-dev package to go along
> with it. I understand their reasoning (the security fix is in libc6, not
> the -dev package), but it appears to be breaking things, such as your
> case. I suggest adding the proposed-updates repo to the sources.list
> aswell. IIRC, this should do it (or some variation):
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian proposed-updates/
Ok doke, thanks for that, this seems to work i.e. the compiler now does
its thing.
For the record, this is what works:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates/
Much Thanks!
--
Mike.Moran@ee.ed.ac.uk
Web: http://houseofmoran.com/
AvantGo: http://houseofmoran.com/Lite/
Reply to: