extra dependencies on libelf0g ?

[Gergely Madarasz <gorgo@caesar.elte.hu>]

I just saw the following:
debella:~# apt-cache showpkg libelfg0
Package: libelfg0
Versions:
0.7.0-1(/var/state/apt/lists/ftp.kfki.hu_pub_linux_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-sparc_Packages)(/var/lib/dpkg/status),0.6.4-8(/var/state/apt/lists/ftp.kfki.hu_pub_linux_debian_dists_stable_main_binary-sparc_Packages),
Reverse Depends:
  screen,libelfg0
  sced,libelfg0
  loadwatch,libelfg0
  libelfg0-dev,libelfg0
  at,libelfg0
  xntp3,libelfg0
  snmp,libelfg0
  screen,libelfg0
  sced,libelfg0
  libelfg0-dev,libelfg0
  elk,libelfg0
  dsc,libelfg0


while on an intel system:
gorgo@thunderchild:~$ apt-cache showpkg libelfg0
Package: libelfg0
Versions:
0.7.0-1(/var/state/apt/lists/lovi.inf.elte.hu:8080_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages),0.6.4-8(/var/state/apt/lists/lovi.inf.elte.hu:8080_debian_dists_slink_main_binary-i386_Packages),
Reverse Depends:
  sced,libelfg0
  libelfg0-dev,libelfg0
  scsh,libelfg0
  sced,libelfg0
  libelfg0-dev,libelfg0
  elk,libelfg0
  dsc,libelfg0

So it seems that some packages are linked against libelfg0 while they
should not be, like at,xntp3,screen,snmp

-- 
Madarasz Gergely           gorgo@caesar.elte.hu         gorgo@linux.rulez.org
      It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.
          Egy pingvinre gyakorlatilag lehetetlen haragosan nezni.
                    HuLUG: http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/